The Good, The Bad and The Terrible ; Zombies | The Horror Online

130218_0002Still more from The Horror Online:  The Good, The Bad and The Terrible ; Zombies | The Horror Online.

Hopefully, I will find the time to sit down and write another extensive post, but unfortunately, these days I seem inundated with personal and professional tasks.  I try to read when I have the opportunity.  When I do have some time free, I have been watching horror films and I have several which I recommend and on which I hope to be writing posts before long.  I also hope to establish a webpage for a nascent lexicon of horror.

Thoughts?  Comments?

The Good, The Bad and The Terrible ; Werewolves | The Horror Online

Werewolf-1Here is an amusing article for fans of cinematic werewolves:  The Good, The Bad and The Terrible ; Werewolves | The Horror Online.

On a side note, I find werewolves a fascinating fictional creature with a lot of as yet unexplored literary possibilities.  I love them as a symbol of the dual nature of humanity:  civilized person under most circumstances, but with the possibility of releasing, whether willingly or not, a dark, inner animalistic nature and suddenly converting into a horrific, bloodthirsty monster.  I started a werewolf/lycanthrope novel of my own many years ago, and perhaps one day I will complete it.

Those of you unfamiliar with the distinction between a werewolf and a lycanthrope please note the following.  A werewolf is a man (or woman) that actually changes into a wolf.  Werewolves exist only in fiction.   A lycanthrope is a person who believes that he or she changes into a wolf.  These do exist, but are rare.  For more information on this condition, please visit the Wikipedia article on Clinical Lycanthropy.

Thoughts?  Comments?

MovieNews | Opinion: How to define a horror film – entertainment.ie

Poster from Johannascheezburger.com via Halloween Mike's Horror Everyday on Facebook.
Poster from Johannascheezburger.com via Halloween Mike’s Horror Everyday on Facebook.

Here is an interesting viewpoint on just what makes a horror film:  MovieNews | Opinion: How to define a horror film – entertainment.ie.

Review of Barrio Tales

Barrio Tales

In Barrio Tales, two well-off American college students (perhaps recent college grads) head into the Mexican border town of Barrio one night to buy cheap drugs from a man named Pedro, whom they have never met.  While they wait in the desert,  a really creepy man comes up to their car and tells them he can take them to Pedro.    They head to a shack where they sit around a campfire and the stranger tells them three horrific stories of Mexicans in the U.S. while the students impatiently wait.   The stories are entitled “Maria”, “Uncle Tio’s Taco Truck”, and “El Monstruo” (The Monster).  The stories, while they can keep your attention, are not great horror.  Perhaps the best way to sum up the movie is as an above-average, low-intensity slasher flick.

“Maria” is the story of the vengeance wreaked by the grandmother of a beautiful young woman who comes to work in the US as a maid at a billionaire’s home.  While the billionaire and his wife are vacationing in the Turks and Caicos, their son comes home from his college graduation to find the new maid and the $15,000 his parents have left him for the summer.  He immediately calls three friends over, including one who is hiding his Mexican heritage from the others (this enables him to be the only one who can communicate decently with Maria). Another, the lead jerk, is hot for the maid and tries to seduce her with marijuana, which she refuses. Later that evening, the friends have some girls over for a pool party involving cocaine and other drugs.  When Maria cannot sleep and comes to the party in her house robe (I assume she is going to ask them to keep the noise down, though she never gets the chance to say why she came down),  the lead jerk tries to coerce her into taking off her clothes.  When she doesn’t comply, he playfully tosses her into the pool.  Unfortunately, she strikes her head on the side of the pool and dies.   The group panics and buries her body.  However, the girl had an apparently intensely mystical connection with her grandmother, who casts a spell that causes each boy to die an excruciatingly gruesome death.

Uncle Tio is a popular man with the teenagers and working people of his southern California neighborhood.  He runs a taco truck and serves delicious tacos, sometimes giving them away.  What makes his tacos so delicious is his secret ingredient:  neighborhood teenagers.  Can you see where this one is going already?

El Monstruo is a local legendary monster that kills illegal immigrants crossing the border.   In the reality of this story, El Monstruo turns out to be a particularly monstrous man and his family of serial killers, who lure groups of Mexicans crossing the border to their ranch, where they dispatch them with a variety of cruel means.  Unfortunately for the family, one of the latest group of victims escapes, who, unknown to the family, is the group’s “coyote” (the trafficker who leads the group across the border).  The coyote fetches his brother and a friend to exact vengeance on El Monstruo and his twisted offspring.

There is not a lot of suspense here.  This movie probably won’t keep you on the edge of your seat, but it is kind of entertaining.  The most interesting facet of the movie is that the cinematography is well done for something this low budget.  Although the movie was produced in 2012,  it has a gritty feel you find in early 70’s pulp horror,.  The characters are well-drawn and the college students are more three-dimensional and realistic than what you find in most slasher films where the actors are simply two-dimensional targets that speak empty-headed lines when they are not screaming in terror.  The acting was above-average and actually showed some degree of depth.

My main complaint about the film is just that the basic premise was just not imaginative.   The film probably would have been a lot better if the screenwriter, director, and producer had gotten together and done something to fire up their imaginations — like using some of the drugs they talk about in the movie.  The feeling I get from this movie is that the director and producer took care of the details, but somehow they missed maintaining a good line of suspense and let the film become all too predictable .

The director and producer also let at least two details slip.  Maria’s grandmother casts a spell to kill Maria’s murderers, yet earlier she insists to one that her grandmother is not a witch.   Meanwhile, the law apparently never gets wind of the accident and no one, even the parents, ever finds out in spite of the fact that there were several students at the party in addition to the four main malefactors.  Maybe I am being overly picayunish, but it just would have been a bit tighter story line if the director could have at least had someone mention that somebody’s parents had paid off a judge or tied up the case in court or something to cover that gap.  This is all I noticed.  It wouldn’t surprise me if there were several more.

Did you think I forgot about the two guys waiting in the desert for Pedro?  You can probably guess the outcome of their story.

The best time to see this film is late night on Netflix while having a few beers or during an attack of insomnia.   Were this still in theatres, I would say that it is worth the price of a matinee, but I wouldn’t spend any more than that.  Do go see it dollar movie night though,  especially if you have had a few drinks and need to sober up, just to see it on the big screen if for no other reason.

Thoughts?  Comments?

 

Movie Review: “The ABC’s of Death”

 

I watched “The ABC’s of Death” about a couple of weeks ago on Netflix.   This is a bizarre, mind-blowing film that is not for the squeamish and definitely not for children.  Though I had to turn my face a couple of times when the gore and violence becaume more than I could stomach, I found it a fun, fascinating film to watch late on a Saturday night particularly as Halloween approaches.

The link above to the Internet Movie Database (IMDb)will give you the vital details, including the following excellent synopsis:

The ABC’s OF DEATH is an ambitious anthology film featuring segments directed by over two dozen of the world’s leading talents in contemporary genre film. Inspired by children’s educational ABC books, the motion picture is comprised of 26 individual chapters, each helmed by a different director assigned a letter of the alphabet. The directors were then given free reign in choosing a word to create a story involving death. Provocative, shocking, funny and ultimately confrontational; THE ABC’s OF DEATH is the definitive snapshot of the diversity of modern horror. Drafthouse Films, Magnet Pictures and Timpson Films are proud to present this alphabetical arsenal of destruction orchestrated by what Fangoria calls “a stunning roll call of some of the most exciting names in horror across the world.”                Written byAnonymous

No matter what your favorite horror subgenre, I would wager there is something in this film for you:  from suspense to gore to horror with an outlandish fantasy twist to shock to nudity to humor to…whatever.

One of the most entertaining aspects to me was to see how a director, once given a letter, used his/her creativity to develop a story based around that letter.  On the surface, this is easy when one is dealing with a common letter like “M” (murder of course springs to mind immediately or mayhem) or “H” (for hell, horror, etc.), but what do you do with “Q” (“Q is for Quack” was my favorite) or “Z” ?   Just watching creative genius at work was a blast for me.

Though I watched it on Netflix, if it was out at theatres, I would say pay full price on a Saturday night to see this.  It is a great date movie–so long as your date has a taste for the bizarre.

Movie Review: The Collection

TheCollectionPoster

 

 

For a long time I have thought it would be fun to do movie reviews.   With this post I will start doing them occasionally for this blog.   My rating system is quite simple:  is the movie worth (a) the full price of admission, (b) the price of a matinee, (c) wait until it comes out on DVD, (d) wait until it comes out on Netflix or some other free venue, or (d) don’t bother.

The Collection has been out for a while and I saw it on Netflix, but this would have been worth the price of full admission on a Saturday night on its release weekend.

This is a tense, edge-of-your-seat, full-throttle horror adventure almost from the opening credits.   While the plot is your basic protagonists-venture-into-the-evil-guy’s-lair-and-fight-their-way-out, this has a lot of tense action and some unexpected twists that make it worthwhile.    There is some gore, but proportionately, it is not as much as in the recent remake of Evil Dead, though there are quite a few bodies that have been turned into gross insect-like creatures by “the collector” that might cause those without strong stomachs to leave the room for a few minutes.   The ending has a nice, little twist that gives the viewer a nice sense of closure to the whole event.

If you are deeply into serious horror as literature or films and sit around with your friends discussing trends in horror literature since the time of Horace Walpole, don’t see this expected to find unbroken ground or new motifs or anything of a high-brow nature.  See this for the pure adrenalin rush that enthralls and takes you beyond the veil of this humdrum reality for a couple of eye-popping hours.

Thoughts?  Comments?

Notes on the movie “Cabin in the Woods”

I watched “Cabin in the Woods” last night for the first time and found it to be a terrific movie.  If you haven’t seen it, I highly recommend it.

The acting is good as is the cinematography, and the action is almost non-stop with wonderfully executed surprises and a reasonable amount of gore that isn’t overdone (as in the recent “Evil Dead” remake).

But what truly fascinated me is the way the director and screenwriter (whose names I unfortunately don’t recall) masterfully intertwined at least three of the most popular horror themes into an incredibly imaginative plot.

The first  is that of five teenagers undergoing a variety of horrors and torments at a secluded cabin in the woods much as in the aforementioned “Evil Dead”.  By the way, the cabin in “Cabin in the Woods” looks a lot like the cabin in the original “Evil Dead” so I have to wonder if they used the same set or simply copied it as a sort of cinematic nod to the horror subgenre of teens in an isolated cabin.

The second theme I think is more commonly seen in science fiction than horror, but it occurs there too:  a covert society of “puppeteers” watches and controls society.  In this case, they are controlling what happens to the teenagers in the cabin for the purpose of sacrificing them to an oligarchy of ancient, evil gods who live below ground.

The oligarchy of ancient, evil gods is the third theme and its best-known incarnation in the horror genre is as the Cthulhu mythos of H.P. Lovecraft, though there have been others, most often derived from Lovecraft’s works, though a few pre-date H.P.

By all means, take the time to view “Cabin in the Woods” for the sheer delight of watching it, if for nothing else.  But if you have a serious interest in the horror genre, be prepared to be swept up in some fascinating analysis.   A lot goes on in this film and anyone well-read in horror will probably be able to spot tons of subtleties that escaped my novice’s eye.

Thoughts?  Comments?

Horror or Not?

Take a look at this quick video called “Appearances Can Be Deceiving” from wimp.com and let me know if you this this might qualify as horror, given the final outcome.   The film is touching and does not set up a suspenseful, mysterious, or otherwise horror-like atmosphere, but there is a touch of the supernatural in its Twilight-Zonish ending.

Lovecraft and “Berkeley Square”

H.P. Lovecraft, 1915
H.P. Lovecraft, 1915

I was lazily drifting through the web tonight, when I came upon a bit of interesting trivia.   According to HPLovecraft.com, one of Lovecraft’s favorite films was “Berkeley Square”.   He is quoted as saying about it:

“But with all its defects this thing gave me an uncanny wallop. When I revisited it I saw it through twice – & I shall probably go again on its next return. It is the most weirdly perfect embodiment of my own moods & pseudo-memories that I have ever seen…” (to J. Vernon Shea, 4 February 1934)

According to the Internet Movie Database, the storyline is:  “A young American man is transported back to London in the time of the American Revolution and meets his ancestors.”

A review by “clementj” on the same page describes it as follows:

“This is a very amusing love story with a good dash of humor. Much of the humor centers around the culture clash between Standish and the 18th century family. Standish uses modern terms and slips when he reveals things that happen in the future. The culture clash is a cautionary tale for would be travelers. This film appealed to many women because Leslie Howard was a heart throb for many of them. My mother loved this film and could watch it over and over. She was so disappointed when late in her life it disappeared from the old movies shown on TV.

“It is currently not commercially available, but a number of vendors have poor quality CDs or tapes for sale. All of these were probably made from a VHS tape from a TV showing. The tape was deteriorated and possibly copied several times so there is a lot of instability and wiggling of the image. The original broadcast used extreme compression of the video and sound. As a result the noise level rises to become very loud until dialog causes the gain to be cut. As a result the dialog is sometimes very indistinct. The music which was originally soft also rises to match the level of the dialog. Once this is restored by hand, the film is fairly listenable. The complaint of another reviewer about the music being too loud may stem from watching a copy with similarly compressed sound. In addition the broadcast severely cropped the film and did not stabilize the jitter.

This is a film that deserves restoration from the existing prints, but when and if this happens is unknown. Until then buying one of the existing CDs may be the only way to view this fine film.”

On the message board at the bottom of that page is a post by aaronjv-1 that mentions that a brand new 35mm print was slated to play at the Lovecraft film festival in September, 2011.   He goes on to say about the film:

“The grandson of director Frank Lloyd will introduce the picture and talk about his granddad’s favorite, which was also H.P. Lovecraft’s favorite–he watched it four times, and it inspired him to write his own classic time-traveler possession tale, “The Shadow Out of Time”.

A quick search on Google reveals that the film is available on youtube at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ge8Qn3pGE_E.

I hope to watch it tonight.   Please feel free to do the same and post your comments here.  I would love to hear what you have to say.

The “Dracula” Conversation

 

 

I am a member of GoodReads.com as are several of my friends.  One, a gentleman named Tim Stamps, whom I have known since my college days at Eastern Kentucky University, recently posted a review of Dracula, on which I commented.  Thus began a brief conversation which I think you may find interesting for several reasons.   I have quoted it below, editing out any non-relevant personal matters (after having obtained Tim’s permission to post it).

 

Tim Stamps’s Reviews > Dracula

16399814

Tim Stamps‘s review

Apr 06, 13
I could only read this during the Winter months, when the weather is cloudy, dark and gloomy. When I read fiction I prefer the classics, to learn how people thought in earlier times. The actual character of Dracula was the most un-interesting of the characters in the book. It turns out that Stoker only knew Vlad’s Dracula name but knew nothing of his past, and the character is actually based more on Jack the Ripper.  Also it was interesting to read a book made up of supposed diary entries and newspaper articles – although most actual diaries and articles written by everyday people are nowhere near as long and detailed, especially back then when paper was scarce. I understand Mary Shelley wrote Frankenstein in the same format, and other books of that time did the same.  If you can find a copy, listen to the first half hour of this Coast to Coast show: http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/20…
 message 1:      by      Phil          –            rated it 4 stars
Phil Slattery      Tim, if you like reading classic horror tales like Dracula, then you should definitely read Frankenstein. Others you may want to check out are The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, The Picture of Dorian Gray, the works of Algernon Blackwood, Lord Dunsany, Arthur Machen, and Joseph Sheridan Le Fanu.  I have been writing horror lately and have established a blog on it that often discusses past writers of the horror genre. You may want to check it out at www.philslattery.wordpress.com.  You may find some of the authors I discuss of interest. One who is known more as a writer of science fiction than of horror (though the boundary is often indistinct at best) is H.G. Wells who wrote The Time Machine, War of the Worlds, The Island of Dr. Moreau, and others.
Tim Stamps      True, I definitely plan to read Frankenstein. Also have been planning on getting into Wuthering Heights and the Brönte sisters books. I’ve always been a fan of H.G. Wells, also Orwell’s dystopian works – still trying to get around to reading Huxley’s Brave New World (when I find my copy) – I can also add ebooks to a kindle, but the kindle doesn’t exactly replace paper.   I’ve depended on the movies too much – finding lots of extra details in the books that the films leave out. (I don’t really spend much time reading actually.) I’ll explore your site.. thanks! By the way, are there any horror films you really like?  Or gothic tales.  There don’t seem to be many recent ones that play into fears as well as the older ones. Some of the classics: “The Innocents” (version of Henry James’ “Turn of the Screw”), George Romero’s “Martin”, “The Exorcist”, even “The Shining” and the early “Halloween” pictures.  Recent films like “The Ring” and “the Sixth Sense” have potential.   I read in your blog that to be a great horror writer you need to understand the psychology and emotions of fear. Perhaps horror screenplay writers nowadays need to go back to the basics – just slashing people up and showing gruesome killings isn’t enough to heighten the sense of fear.  They seem to have forgotten Hitchcock and his methods of manipulating people’s emotions, although that was a time when people actually paid attention to dialog. I don’t know what it’s going to take to make a great horror movie today. Is it even possible?
Phil SlatteryTim wrote: “True, I definitely plan to read Frankenstein. Also have been planning on getting into Wuthering Heights and the Brönte sisters books. I’ve always been a fan of H.G. Wells, also Orwell’s dystopian w…”
Yes, you are right in all accounts, except that modern screenplay writers need to go back to the basics.  They cannot go back to someplace they have never been.   They need to learn the basics first. Stephen King identifies three types of horror:  horror, the gross-out, and terror (the exact lengthy quote can be found on GoodReads).  Modern, popular, mass-market screenplay writers use the gross-out form to excess. The great horror writers of the past (such as Lovecraft, Poe, Blackwood, etc.) never described anything gross.  Yet their tales are terrifying.   There is an art to horror, and Hitchcock’s concept of suspense (i.e. terror lies not in seeing something happen, but in knowing that something is about to happen) is one of the best means of achieving horror.
There are great horror movies today, but one has to veer away from the mass-market and Hollywood to find them.  Independent films and small companies are your best shot:  someone who cares about the art.  Netflix and Hulu TV are good for finding these (and finding them cheaply at that).  The series American Horror Story is quite entertaining, though it can be bloody at times. Foreign films can be an excellent source with Japan, Korea, England, Australia, and Spain coming immediately to mind. I noted that your profile says you are in the Seattle area now.  Lion’s Gate Films in Vancouver, BC makes some good films (outside of the horrifyingly gross-out Saw series).
I have seen some good horror films lately, but am having a hard time recalling their names, therefore I am reviewing some lists of top horror films on line, but of course that isn’t helping much as the lists are mass-market oriented.  One that pops out now is the original Swedish version of “Let the Right One In”.  “Dagon”, a Spanish film based somewhat loosely on a Lovecraft story (“The Shadow over Innsmouth”) is not bad. The New Zealand film “The Devil’s Island” has some interesting ideas behind it, though it is quite bloody.  That’s all I can think of on the spur of the moment.
Tim Stamps      hi Phil, Sorry about “Seattle” – don’t know how that happened (I must’ve not filled it in – the site just guessed or something.) Anyway, actually I am (still) in… I love watching foreign horror… for 70s-era foreign horror, Dario Argento comes to mind, although he leans toward the gross-out variety.  Lovecraft-written films are always great. I’ll check out these you mention (and any others you run across) – if you come up with a list of interesting foreign horror for the last 3 decades or so let me know. I have one plug: watch for “Nobody in Particular”, a crime-drama I helped out on, being re-edited – should be out sometime this year.
Thoughts?  Comments?